|[ Abstract for this presentation ] [ Proceedings Contents ] [ Schedule ] [ Abstracts ]
Online collaborative projects: A journey for two Year 5 technology rich classroomsIan W. Gaynor and Barry J. Fraser
Science and Mathematics Education Centre
Curtin University of Technology
This paper documents the experiences of two teachers while they taught an online, thematic, outcome focused, portfolio based learning experience in two technology rich classrooms. This learning experience provided two classes of year 5 students with an opportunity to enhance their literacy, geography and information technology skills. The study, part of a longer term research program, explores the use of an online resource within a classroom where every student has a notebook computer and access to the Internet using wireless technology.
Two themes will be explored in this paper, firstly the pedagogical practices of the teachers and secondly the levels of collaboration and cooperation of the students, while working within an online environment.
The outcome of this online learning experience for the teachers was a dynamic, collaborative, student centred and constructivist classroom, while the students explored engaging and rewarding learning opportunities. This paper documents the teachers' experiences and students' journey while providing an informative and rewarding insight into a dynamic learning environment and presents a useful model of information technology integration.
The technology infrastructure provided within the classroom reflected the innovative and advanced application of wireless technology, the provision of ample power supply and networked technical and systems support. These initiatives and strategies provided an opportunity for teachers to focus on the transparent embedding of ICT into the curriculum.
This case study is significant in that it contributes to the field of learning environments and the use of educational technology in the classroom through exploring the use of an online resource by teachers and students in a personal notebook computer program.
Fouts and Stuen (1997) also reported that a student's writing, communication, and presentation skills improved markedly when a notebook computer was used in the classroom. Finally, the ability of all students to access a notebook enabled them to learn using the same tools, to access the same information sources and to present their work using the same delivery mechanisms (Bradshaw & Massey, 1996).
Research conducted by Gardner, Morrison, Jarman, Reilly, and McNally (1994) identified that notebook computers can increase the ability of students to undertake inquiry based activities and project based and self directed tasks. McMillan and Honey (1993) identified that students participating in notebook programs had marked improvements in persuasive communication skills, compiled information more easily, organised effectively and possessed and used a wider range of vocabulary.
The online task involved the students taking a virtual holiday trip around Australia. The task required each student using the resources provided to visit electronically at least one coastal and one outback region for each Australian state and mainland territory. This represented a total of six states and two territories. There were 16 locations and therefore 16 postcards. While visiting each virtual location, students were required to select an appropriate electronic photograph from the images provided, compose the postcard text and email this e-postcard to the partner school.
The concepts and principles that were developed or integrated into the unit of study included:
A combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods was used within this case study. Qualitative information was based on the interpretive framework of Erickson (Erickson, 1998). Previous studies have successfully applied a multiple method approach to describe the complex nature of the classroom for the students within a class, or for groups within a school (Fraser, 1999; Fraser & Tobin, 1991). The observations were approximately two hours in duration and were conducted on a weekly basis for seven weeks. The observations were used to develop a commentary on the classroom. By using such a method, it was possible to use classroom observations and interviews to establish a rich perspective on the classroom and its learning environment. The mechanism for establishing this rich perspective was through the idea of researcher-as-bricoleur (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994). The data used for this particular analysis involved the intensive observations of one class and interviews with both teachers.
...You're always on the go ... you don't have your time out like I used to. ...When the kids are all engaged you are either with a small group of students (so that you are conferencing them) or assisting and guiding them. [8:2002:11/09] The changing role of the teacher was also evident in the level of collaboration and communication with the partner teacher. They would meet, talk, collaborate and decide on the progress and nature of the program and determine further areas for enhancement, improvement and consolidation. The increased levels of reflection also involved exploring potential methods of refinement for the further use of the online program for the following year.
I suppose that the use of the notebook computer has been a good challenge for me in my teaching. To actually instigate something has been new and challenging. It just opens up a lot of options and a lot of avenues in learning experiences and learning ideas for the students [9:2002:11/09].A shift also occurred in the teachers' role in the classroom from a directive role to a facilitative role. The teachers indicated that the e-postcard task increased the opportunities for flexibility in the task and enabled a change to a more student focused environment. This resulted in the students taking a higher level of ownership in the selection and structure of the task and having pride in the emailed postcards and any related work. This occurred despite the students having a defined set of expectations regarding the postcard production. This flexibility of the teaching program to meet the students' needs enabled each student to make an increased level of commitment and ownership of the learning context. This ownership was important and valued by the students:
I suppose that is one of the things that was good: just allowing students to branch off on areas of interest within the framework of the study. Before, you would have your teaching program organised and that is the only way you went. However, in this context, you start with a base of the program or project and its outcomes and then kids come along and say: "Oh I'd really like to go this way, or I'd really like to research this, or I'd really like to look more into this". Then you can actually ask to them to bring me back their plan of what they want to do. I think that's starting to happen now. A couple of kids are coming up and saying "I'd really like to" or "Can we do something on this?" I'd say: "Well you can do that on your own, and you don't have to ask me to do an extra or individual project on this particular topic." The students are actually going off and researching on their own to support areas of the e-portfolio. The notebooks have opened up a lot to some of them. [22:2002:11/09]Observations of the classroom and interviews with the teachers indicated that the teachers were required to change the way in which they worked with the students and to implement strategies that addressed or improved the changed teaching circumstance in the student centred classroom. These changes made by the teacher eased the process of transition, for the teacher and student, to a student centred classroom. The changes that the teacher made included the types of assessment, modes of observation and student conferencing to ensure an appropriate level of knowledge of all students' progress and achievement was maintained:
The e-portfolio task and the use of the notebook computers have enabled some students to move on and develop their own investigation. A couple of students are looking at debating whether Uluru should be climbed or should not be climbed. So they're researching that aspect, they're taking a different viewpoint and then they're debating that to the class. The students are starting to move out and become more in control of what they are doing. [23:2002:11/09]Doing an online collaborative project motivated the students, but the e-postcard program did not have a high level of success with all students, due to the lack of response from some of the students in the partner school. In many cases, partners were created with students in the other year 5 class.
This is a problem with these online projects. We're trying to remedy it all the time. Some kids are getting feedback and it is great. Some aren't and so there is that element of disappointment. Initially they were really quite keen to get involved. It was central that we were going to communicate with someone else whom they did not know. It was quite motivating and they got behind the program [27:2002:11/09].The participating teachers noted that an important factor of the e-postcard program was the level of ownership and control that the students had in the way in which they work on the production of the assessment items. With this high level of ownership, students very rarely were off task. They required little redirection or focus. On many occasions, they were still engaged and often unaware that the lesson had concluded. Additionally the teachers experienced little or no behavioural or discipline related problems:
The biggest thing is just the motivation for kids. The motivation for learning, I think, has come in with these children. Because of the facilitative role that I have and the student centred nature of the classroom, I don't have any behaviour management problems like ones that I would normally have had in previous years. [36:2002:11/09]
I really liked the collaboration that exists with the use of the notebooks in the classroom, as well as the peer tutoring that results. It is just real positive stuff --- just having the kids being able to learn from each other, being able to collaborate on different projects... on everyday tasks. The notebook computers and the thematic study have allowed students to explore areas not previously available. The kids at the beginning of the year needed significant guidance and direction, but they are now independent, they are inventing, and they actually are letting themselves independently think and create, predict, explore and learn at rates and in areas not previously demonstrated. [39:2002:11/09]In many cases, students sought support and advice from their peers before seeking help from their teacher, despite the teacher constantly being available and moving around the classroom to assist and help students. However, some students still needed a level of direction and guidance to assist in task completion:
It's like any class. You have students with different developmental levels, but a lot of them have become more independent and more responsible, and they value their own learning and just being able to be confident to experiment and do things on their own [51:2002:11/09].One of the features of student use of the notebook computers was students' modelling of effective use of notebook computers and the application of computer software to complete or solve problems. This included the use of Inspiration to develop timelines or create concept maps, or the use of simple sound edit programs to capture and attach a sound files to the postcard.
The students were con sistently making independent choices as to which tool on the computer could efficiently solve a given task. However there has been a lot of the instruction in the use of applications and computer software to start with. Now they are actually starting to think about what tool they could use for this particular task [73:2002:11/09].Students also gained ideas about page layout, and about design that was modelled by peers or by using a data projector to show and explain completed class work. Then students justified how and why the product was created. The notebooks and the online task prompted students to look, to reflect, to search and to make decisions.
The e-postcard task was not complex or highly defined. The task built upon and promoted high levels of cooperation through shared problem solving and peer mentoring. The e-postcard task enabled students to learn from personal and other students' successes and failures. Through this experience, individuals explored and built on existing knowledge and success through a thematic online collaborative task. Students experienced problems in the lack of feedback from the partner school, requiring the teacher to support and assist students from the other year 5 class as online e-partners. Students also exploited the opportunities of independence, cooperation and collaboration by working and sharing their ideas via email and group meetings, and by using modes of learning that suited the given context.
Teachers and students clearly indicated that the personal notebook computer, with its wireless networking technology, provided the opportunities for learning anywhere at anytime. The opportunity to produce work at high standards provided students with access to motivating and relevant resources, appropriate for their task, from a large range of resources. This enabled the students to work independently and collaboratively, and to select software tools appropriate to the task. Students were encouraged to use the notebook computer as a diary and a planner, recording not only the development of the postcard in their own portfolio, but also new vocabulary, spelling results and other daily statistical data. This use encouraged many students to view the computer as a valuable tool rather than an expensive toy. The role of the teacher reinforced the changing nature of the classroom in that the online task encouraged the teacher to facilitate and encourage individualisation and excellence. This shift also encouraged and reinforced a task-orientated classroom promoting peer mentoring and student collaboration. The collaborative, inquiry-based, student-centred classroom provided students with many opportunities to find success and to develop a sense of ownership in their online task.
The use of the online e-portfolio task reinforced and enhanced the existing use of notebook computers and constructivist pedagogical practices, and provided opportunities for students to explore and enhance an already-existing student-centred classroom. Students clearly demonstrated that they desired an improvement in the classroom-learning environment. It was clear that the success of the e-postcard task relied not only upon the task structure and upon the classroom strategies used to exploit its potential for the students, but also the provision of seamless access to reliable portable notebook technology with broadband wireless network support and reliable technical support services. The high levels of technology infrastructure support enabled a rich and vibrant learning environment where the student was the priority.
Becker, H. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291-321.
Berg, S., Benz, C. R., Lasley, T. J., & Raisch, C. D. (1998). Exemplary technology use in elementary classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 111-122.
Bitter, G., & Pierson, M. (2002). Using technology in the classroom (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bradshaw, A., & Massey, J. (1996). Designing a virtual classroom through the use of laptop computers. Paper presented at the annual international conference of the National College Chair Academy, Phoenix, AZ.
Clark, R. E. (1991). When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from the media. Educational Technology, 31(2), 34-40.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1998). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Curriculum Council. (1998). Curriculum framework for kindergarten to Year 12 education in Western Australia. Perth, Western Australia: Curriculum Council.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In K. G. Tobin (Ed.), The international handbook of science education (pp. 1155-1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fouts, J., & Stuen, C. (1997). Copernicus project: Learning with laptops: Year 1 evaluation report. ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED 416 847).
Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493-541). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J. (1999). "Grain sizes" in learning environment research: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), New directions for teaching practice and research (pp. 285-296). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Fraser, B. J. (2001). Twenty thousand hours: Editor's introduction. Learning Environments Research: An International Journal, 4, 1-5.
Fraser, B. J., & Maor, D. (2000). A learning environment instrument for evaluating students' and teachers' perceptions of constructivist multimedia learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. (1991). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in classroom environment research. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 271-291). London: Pergamon Press.
Gardner, J., Morrison, H., Jarman, R., Reilly, C., & McNally, H. (1994). Learning with portable computers. Computers and Education, 22, 161-171.
Maor, D., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Use of classroom environment perceptions in evaluating inquiry-based computer assisted learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 401-421.
McMillan, K., & Honey, M. (1993). Year One of Projec t PULSE: Pupils Using Laptops in Science and English. A final report. Technical Report No 26. New York: Bank Street College of Education. ERIC Document Service (ED 358 822).
Newhouse, P. C. (2002, July 29 - 3 August). Networking the learner: Computers in education. Paper presented at the Seventh IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education (WCCE) 2001, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stacey, E. (2002). E-Learning for flexibility. Directions in Education, 11(9), 4.
Sulla, N. (1999). Technology: To use or infuse. http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/commentary/1999-02.asp
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. [viewed 20 July 2003] ftp://ftp.ets.org/pub/res/technolog.pdf
|This paper is based on a paper presented at the Third International Conference on Science Mathematics and Technology Education, January 2002, East London, South Africa.
Please cite as: Gaynor, I. W. and Fraser, B. J. (2003). Online collaborative projects: A journey for two Year 5 technology rich classrooms. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum 2003. http://www.waier.org.au/forums/2003/gaynor.html